Quantum Computing

Machines

7 ways to build a qubit. Each has a biggest machine and a best number, dated and sourced, because both move.

the trade

Fast and short-lived, or slow and long-lived

A chip qubit does a gate in billionths of a second and is gone in a ten-thousandth. An ion takes a thousand times longer per gate and lasts minutes. Nobody has both yet.

Superconducting circuits

A qubit printed on a chip: a loop of metal with no electrical resistance, cooled so cold it behaves like one big atom.

how it works

The circuit has energy rungs like an atom's. Microwave pulses move it between the bottom two rungs, and those two are 0 and 1. The transmon design from 2007 is the standard. The chip sits at the bottom of a dilution refrigerator at about 15 thousandths of a degree above absolute zero.

Fast gates, tens of billionths of a second. Made with chip-factory methods, so counts grow quickly. Google, IBM and China's USTC all use it, and it is where the error-correction milestones of 2023 to 2025 happened.

Short-lived: a qubit holds its state for around a ten-thousandth of a second. Each qubit can only talk to its neighbours on the chip. Every qubit needs its own wiring into the fridge, which is the wall between hundreds and millions.

coldabout 0.015 kelvin, colder than deep spacegatetens of nanosecondslasts0.1 to 1 millisecond biggestIBM Condor, 1,121 qubits (2023-12) — source. the biggest chip by count; IBM's later chips are smaller and cleaner qualityGoogle Willow: two-qubit gate error about 0.15%; error-corrected memory below threshold (2024-12) — source

Who: Google Quantum AI, IBM, Rigetti, IQM, USTC (Zuchongzhi), Alice & Bob (cat qubits), AWS (Ocelot)

Trapped ions

Single charged atoms held in mid-air by electric fields, in a vacuum, with lasers doing the work.

how it works

An ion, an atom missing one electron, is held by oscillating electric fields in a trap the size of a fingernail. Two of its energy levels are 0 and 1. Laser pulses, or in newer designs microwave signals through the trap's own electrodes, flip and entangle them. Ions in a chain all feel each other's charge, so any ion can be entangled with any other.

The cleanest qubits there are: gate errors below one in ten thousand, and a state that lasts seconds to minutes. Every ion is identical because nature made it. Any-to-any connections.

Slow: a two-qubit gate takes millionths of a second, a thousand times slower than a superconducting chip. Chains get unwieldy past a few dozen ions, so big machines shuttle ions between zones, which costs time.

coldthe ions are laser-cooled to near absolute zero; the trap itself can be at room temperature or mildly cooledgate1 to 100 microsecondslastsseconds to minutes biggestQuantinuum Helios, 98 qubits (2025-11) — source. two-qubit accuracy 99.921% at launch qualityOxford single-ion gate: one error in 6.7 million single-qubit operations (2025-06) — source

Who: Quantinuum (Honeywell), IonQ, with Oxford Ionics, AQT, Universal Quantum, eleQtron

Neutral atoms

Ordinary uncharged atoms, hundreds or thousands of them, each pinned in a spot of laser light like a bead in tweezers.

how it works

A laser is split into a grid of focused spots, and each spot traps one atom. The atoms' electron energy levels are 0 and 1. To entangle two, a laser kicks them into a hugely swollen 'Rydberg' state, in which neighbouring atoms shove each other and so become linked. The tweezers can move atoms around during a computation, so the wiring is whatever you want it to be.

Counts scale fast: 6,100 atoms trapped at Caltech in 2025. Atoms can be moved, so error-correcting codes that need odd connections are easy to lay out. This is where the largest logical-qubit demonstrations have been, at Harvard and QuEra.

Atoms fall out of the tweezers and have to be replaced, which until 2025 meant stopping the machine. Gates are slower than superconducting ones and the Rydberg step is delicate. Readout is slow: a camera photographs the array.

coldatoms laser-cooled to millionths of a degree; vacuum chamber at room temperaturegatearound a microsecondlastsseconds biggestCaltech tweezer array, 6,100 qubits (2025-09) — source. trapped and controlled, not entangled; the largest entangled processor is Harvard/QuEra's 448-atom machine of November 2025 qualityHarvard/MIT/QuEra 448-atom processor: all the pieces of fault tolerance on one machine, errors falling as the code grew (2025-11) — source

Who: QuEra (with Harvard and MIT), Pasqal, Atom Computing (with Microsoft), Infleqtion, planqc, Google (from 2026)

Photons

Particles of light running through channels etched in glass or silicon, with the computation done by how they split, merge and get detected.

how it works

A qubit is one photon, and 0 or 1 is which of two paths it is on, or which way it is polarised. Beam splitters and phase shifters do the one-qubit turns. Two-qubit gates are the hard part: photons ignore each other, so the trick is to make the gate happen with a measurement and try again when it fails. The 2001 KLM paper showed this can work.

Room temperature for the optics (the detectors are cooled). Photons do not decohere in flight and travel down ordinary fibre, so linking modules is natural. Chips come off standard semiconductor lines.

Photons get lost, and a lost photon is an error you cannot fix by waiting. Gates only work some of the time, so the scheme needs enormous numbers of photons and detectors per useful qubit. No photonic machine has yet run a general program of any size; the headline results are sampling tasks.

coldoptics at room temperature; single-photon detectors at about 1 kelvingatenanoseconds when it works; the gates are probabilisticlastslimited by loss, not by time biggestUSTC Jiuzhang 4.0, 3,050 qubits (2026-05) — source. photons detected in one sampling run; a special-purpose machine, not a programmable computer qualityPsiQuantum Omega chipset: chips made on a GlobalFoundries production line (2025-02) — source

Who: PsiQuantum, Xanadu, Quandela, USTC (Jiuzhang), ORCA

Spins in silicon

A single electron, or the nucleus of a single atom, sitting in a silicon chip made the same way as the ones in phones.

how it works

An electron has a spin, a tiny magnet that points up or down, and that is the qubit. It is held in a dot a few billionths of a metre across, and microwaves flip it. Bruce Kane's 1998 idea used single phosphorus atoms in silicon; the newer designs use electrons in tiny transistor-like structures.

The smallest qubits there are, and made with the tools of the chip industry, so in principle millions fit on one chip. Runs at about 1 kelvin, warmer than superconducting qubits, which makes the cooling far easier.

Counts are small so far, a dozen or so on one chip. Every dot is slightly different, so each qubit needs tuning. Wiring millions of dots is an unsolved problem, though the industry has a head start.

coldabout 1 kelvingatetens of nanoseconds to microsecondslastsmilliseconds for electrons, seconds for nuclei biggestIntel Tunnel Falls, 12 qubits (2023-06) — source. a research chip Intel distributed to universities qualityUNSW nuclear spins: two-qubit gate errors below 1% and single-qubit coherence of seconds have been reported (2022) — source

Who: Intel, Diraq, Quantum Motion, Silicon Quantum Computing, Equal1

Topological qubits

A qubit stored in the shape of how particles are arranged along a wire, so that local noise cannot see it. Nobody has shown one working for sure.

how it works

The idea from Kitaev in 1997: certain exotic particles, Majorana modes, would appear at the ends of a superconducting nanowire, and information shared between the two ends could only be disturbed by something acting on both ends at once. If it works, error correction becomes far cheaper.

In principle, a qubit that ignores most noise by construction, so a useful machine needs far fewer physical qubits.

Whether the Majorana modes exist in the devices is disputed. Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip of February 2025 was announced with a Nature paper that did not itself show them, and a peer-reviewed challenge in June 2026 found errors in the test Microsoft used. As of 2026 no topological qubit has run a gate.

coldabout 0.02 kelvingatenot demonstratedlastsnot demonstrated biggestMicrosoft Majorana 1, 8 qubits (2025-02) — source. claimed; the underlying physics is contested qualityMajorana 2: parity lifetimes over 20 seconds, per a company paper (2026-06) — source

Who: Microsoft

Annealers

A different kind of machine: thousands of superconducting qubits that settle into a low-energy arrangement, the way a hot metal cools into its shape. It answers 'what is the cheapest arrangement' questions and cannot run general programs.

how it works

You write your problem as a landscape of hills and valleys and the machine looks for the lowest valley. It starts every qubit in superposition and slowly turns on the landscape, and quantum tunnelling lets it slip through hills a hot metal would have to climb. There are no gates; you cannot run Shor's or Grover's method on it.

Big counts and a commercial product since 2011. Some optimisation and physics-simulation tasks fit it well.

No proof it beats the best ordinary methods on a practical problem. The March 2025 'beyond classical' claim was reproduced on ordinary computers in May 2026. It is not what most of this site is about.

coldabout 0.015 kelvingateno gates; a run takes microsecondslastsnot the relevant number biggestD-Wave Advantage2, 4,400 qubits (2025-05) — source. annealing qubits, not comparable with gate-model counts qualityAdvantage2: the 2025 Science simulation claim, reproduced classically in 2026 (2026-05) — source

Who: D-Wave

The trade, drawn

1 ns10 ns100 ns1 µs10 µs100 µs100 µs1 ms10 ms0.1 s1 s10 s100 s1000 sSuperconducting circuitsSuperconducting circuitsTrapped ionsTrapped ionsNeutral atomsNeutral atomsSpins in siliconSpins in siliconhow long one two-qubit gate takes (across) against how long a qubit lasts (up); rough, one number per familya machine wants to be far up and far left: many gates before the state is gone

Order-of-magnitude figures from the rows above; the numbers are in machines.json with the text they were chosen to match.

Reading a machine announcement

  1. Which kind. An annealer is not a gate machine. Neutral-atom counts often mean atoms trapped, not entangled.
  2. Physical or logical. A thousand physical qubits and a hundred logical qubits are different worlds; the second is worth far more.
  3. The two-qubit error rate. 99% is 2019. 99.9% is 2024. 99.99% is what error-correction plans assume.
  4. The task. A random-sampling benchmark shows the hardware works; it is not a use. Chemistry, materials and codes are uses.
  5. Who checked. A Nature paper, a company blog and a press release are three different levels of checking. The Now page names which.