a wordboneless
also: boneless wings · wyngz · boneless bites
An adjective that got promoted: on most menus 'boneless' is now a noun and the wing is silent.
Breast meat cut into pieces, floured and spiced, fried or baked, then sauced like a wing and sold under the wing's name. Wikipedia describes them as "essentially small pieces of skinless, boneless chicken breast that are coated in flour and spices, then fried or baked, like a chicken nugget", sometimes marketed as wyngz. Restaurants added them as raw wing prices rose and as some diners asked for a neater plate.
First seen. 25 July 2024 as a term of art in Ohio law, when the Supreme Court of Ohio construed 'boneless wings' in Berkheimer v. REKM, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-2787 — a dated judicial reading, not the word's first use, which is older and undated here
The related spelling 'wyngz' is a labelling rule, not a joke. Consumer Reports, reporting the FSIS policy in February 2011, records that the agency allows the spelling for a product shaped like a wing or sold as a bite-size appetizer only under conditions including that the poultry is white chicken and "the product does not contain any wing meat", and that "no other misspellings are permitted". Wiktionary glosses it as a respelling of wings. Cited · web-berkheimer-opinion
The story Cited · web-berkheimer-nbc
The word went to court. Michael Berkheimer ordered boneless wings with parmesan garlic sauce at Wings on Brookwood in Butler County, Ohio, and days later an emergency room found a chicken bone lodged in his oesophagus. He sued the restaurant, its supplier and the chicken farm. On 25 July 2024 the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed summary judgment against him, 4-3.
Justice Joseph T. Deters wrote for the majority that the label was "merely a description of the cooking style", and that "A diner reading 'boneless wings' on a menu would no more believe that the restaurant was warranting the absence of bones" than believe the item came off a wing. Justice Michael P. Donnelly, dissenting, called that reasoning "utter jabberwocky" and wrote: "The reasonable expectation that a person has when someone sells or serves him or her boneless chicken wings is that the chicken does not have bones in it." He also asked: "Does anyone really believe that the parents in this country who feed their young children boneless wings or chicken tenders or chicken nuggets or chicken fingers expect bones to be in the chicken? Of course they don't."
The holding is Ohio's and it is about negligence, not about menus: it decides who bears a risk, not what a word ought to mean. Four justices and three justices read the same two words differently, in writing, and both readings are on the record.
How it is done Tradition
Ordered the way a bone-in wing is — count, sauce, dip — and eaten with fingers or a fork, which is the point people who order them make. They come in pieces of roughly even size, so a twenty-piece boneless and a twenty-piece bone-in are not the same amount of food.
The particulars
| part of speech | adjective |
|---|---|
| region | The United States |
| confidence | high · needs verification · updated 2026-09-16 |
Who it runs with
Where we got it
- Buffalo wing · link
- Berkheimer v. REKM, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-2787, 2024 · link
- It's OK for 'boneless' chicken wings to have bones, Ohio Supreme Court rules — Associated Press, 2024 · link
- Court Decision Concerning "Boneless Chicken Wings" Ignites Political Firestorm in Ohio, 2024 · link
- Stephen Colbert's right wyngz rhetoric, 2011 · link
- wyngz · link
- Chicken nugget · link
Where it came from: Cited a source we name · Harvested pulled from an open dataset · Tradition what the tradition says, hedged · Inference this project's reasoning · Field somebody stood there. This record as JSON.