Amulet Atlas

peopleSiegfried Seligmann

peopleWestern EuropeRome and ItalyGreece and the AegeanThe LevantGermanyconfidence mediumneeds checking

German ophthalmologist and independent scholar, 1870–1926, who wrote the largest survey of the evil eye anybody has attempted. "Der böse Blick und Verwandtes", two volumes, 1910, collects the belief and its objects across languages and centuries; German scholarship still calls it an indispensable standard work. He assembled a collection of more than 1,500 amulets while writing it.

cited

When

12 June 1870 – 10 November 1926 cited

PeriodWilhelmine and Weimar Germany
How the date is knowntextual — a dated text describes it

Years are stored astronomically — 1 CE is 1, 1 BCE is 0, 500 BCE is −499 — and printed the way a reader says them. How these dates are made.

The story

Seligmann was born at Wandsbek on 12 June 1870 and practised in Hamburg. An eye doctor writing about the eye that harms is a coincidence he does not seem to have made much of; what he did was read everything. "Der böse Blick und Verwandtes" in 1910 was followed by "Die Zauberkraft des Auges und das Berufen" in 1922 and, after his death on 10 November 1926, by "Die magischen Heil- und Schutzmittel aus der unbelebten Natur" in 1927 — the protective and healing materials drawn from the mineral world.

He married Alice Bettina Warburg in 1904, and the family connection shows in where his papers went. His ethnological library was taken into the Warburg Kulturwissenschaftliche Bibliothek in Hamburg; since 1987 his papers have been held by the Warburg Institute in London. The amulet collection itself was bought in 1927 for Hamburg's ethnological museum.

The German Wikipedia entry records that his Hamburg residence later became a Judenhaus — one of the buildings into which Jewish residents were forced under Nazi persecution. That happened after his death.

Inference — the reason this atlas cites Seligmann rather than paraphrasing him is that his footnotes name sources this project can chase; he was compiling, not theorising, and the compilation is what has lasted.

cited

Now

The books are in German and mostly untranslated, which is why English writing on the eye tends to reach for Elworthy's 1895 volume first even though Seligmann's is larger and later. His collection and his papers sit in two different cities and two different countries, which is the ordinary fate of a private amulet collection.

inference

What this is near

motifThe eyethe sign his two 1910 volumes chased through every language he could readkinNazarthe bead form of the sign, one of the many he catalogued rather than one he singled outparallelFrederick Thomas Elworthyhis English counterpart, fifteen years earlier and far shorter; Seligmann read himparallelWalter Leo Hildburghanother private amulet collector of the same decades whose collection also ended up in a public museumtraditionEuropean folk apotropaic craftthe tradition his survey covers most densely, though he reached well past EuropestoryThe eye everywherethe long read; his 1910 volumes are its largest single source in any language

Where this came from

Elsewhere

Record updated 2026-09-16. This record as JSON. Every field carries its own provenance; the tier chips above say which.

Pass it on