an organization · United KingdomHuman Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
also: HFEA
British clinics call it the Register, and quote their rate out of it. The rate is a rate OF something, and which something changes the answer by more than any clinic does.
The United Kingdom's fertility regulator, and the body that licenses every clinic in the country performing IVF, donor insemination or research on human embryos. It describes itself as "the UK's independent regulator of fertility treatment and research using human embryos" and "the first statutory body of our type in the world", set up under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 as an arm's-length body of the Department of Health and collecting data on every licensed treatment since 1 August 1991. It licenses, inspects, can amend, suspend or revoke a licence, publishes results clinic by clinic, and rates the extras sold alongside a cycle.
The story Cited · hfea-2024-trends
Start with what makes this record unusual. The Authority puts its own workload at over 75,000 cycles of treatment a year — the 2024 report counts over 100,000 once freezing cycles are added in — and holds what it calls "the largest register of fertility data in the world", and it publishes out of that register a table of named clinics with each one's birth rate beside it. Two regulators on earth do that: this one and the American federal reporting. Everywhere else a clinic's figure is the clinic's own claim about itself.
The second thing is what the figure counts. A birth rate is a fraction, and the fight is in the bottom half of it. Birth per embryo transferred is "the percentage of the total number of embryos transferred that led to a birth" over twelve months, and it counts only the cycles that got as far as a transfer. Birth per egg collection procedure starts earlier, at the retrieval, and gathers in the frozen transfers from that same collection for up to two years. A rate per cycle started begins earlier again, at the ovulatory stimulation stage, so it carries every cycle that yielded no eggs, or eggs that made no embryo worth transferring. In 2024 the average IVF birth rate per embryo transferred was 30 per cent — 38 per cent for patients aged 18 to 34, 8 per cent for those aged 43 to 44.
Inference — the further back the denominator starts, the smaller the number, and the gap is not a rounding difference. The American register shows the size of it in one line: for patients over 40 in 2022, live-birth deliveries ran at 25.4 per cent of transfers against 7.7 per cent of intended egg retrievals, because every cycle that never reached a transfer has dropped out of the smaller denominator. A percentage quoted with no denominator attached cannot be read, and the clinic pages a patient compares abroad rarely attach one.
The third thing is the add-on ratings. An add-on is an extra treatment, test or technique sold alongside a standard cycle, and the Authority grades each one on a five-colour scale by what the evidence shows: green where high-quality evidence shows it improves the outcome, yellow where it is not clear, grey where there is not enough moderate or high quality evidence to rate it, black where the evidence shows no effect, and red where "There are potential safety concerns and/or, on balance, the findings from moderate/high quality evidence shows that this add-on may reduce treatment effectiveness." Five add-ons carried the red rating on the page read for this record: endometrial receptivity testing, intravenous immunoglobulin, steroids, platelet-rich plasma, and pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. PGT-A — screening embryos for chromosome number before transfer — is rated red for improving the chance of a birth and green for reducing miscarriage, rated 16 October 2023, on the reasoning that it "is a selection tool that often reduces the number of embryos available for transfer".
And then the regulator argues with its own table. "Use success rates as a rough guide and not a prediction", it says, because "differences of just one or two percentage points are often down to chance rather than being a reflection of a clinic's abilities".
Inference — every one of these instruments stops at the border. The licence, the register, the rating and the complaints route cover clinics in the United Kingdom. A patient who flies to Alicante, Prague or Kyrenia is buying from a clinic this Authority does not license, cannot inspect and does not count, and the add-on rated red here is sold there with no rating at all.
How it works Cited · hfea-about
A clinic applies for a licence, is inspected, and holds it subject to conditions; the Authority can amend, suspend or revoke it. Every treatment in a licensed clinic is reported to the Register, which runs continuously since August 1991. Out of the Register come two publications: an annual trends and figures report, and Choose a Fertility Clinic, the clinic-by-clinic comparison tool. Separately, an evidence review rates treatment add-ons on the five-colour scale and republishes the rating with the reasoning attached. The Register also holds donor records, which is the mechanism behind the identity-release rule.
Today Cited · hfea-about
As of 17 September 2026 the most recent published year is 2024, in a report issued 16 June 2026 from a register snapshot taken on 6 May 2026, with its birth outcomes marked preliminary. 107 clinics held a licence in 2023/24. The PGT-A ratings date from 16 October 2023.
Notes
A published birth rate on this site always carries its denominator. Per embryo transferred, per egg collection and per cycle started are three different numbers about the same treatment.
The particulars
| kind | regulator |
|---|---|
| iso2 | United Kingdom (GB) |
| founded | 1991 |
| status | open |
| region | Western Europe |
| address | 2nd floor, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom Cited · hfea-about |
| where | 51.5427, -0.0052 (street) · OpenStreetMap · open in maps Inference · hfea-foi |
| links | HFEA · Choose a fertility clinic · Treatment add-ons |
| confidence | high · updated 2026-09-17 |
What it connects to
Pages that point here
Sources
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority — clinic licensing and published results — HFEA (United Kingdom) · link (read 2026-09-16)
- About us — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-17)
- Key facts and statistics — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-16)
- Fertility treatment 2024: trends and figures — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-17)
- Fertility treatment 2024: quality and methodology report — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-17)
- Finding the right clinic for you — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-17)
- Treatment add-ons — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-17)
- Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) — treatment add-ons rating — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-16)
- Choose a Fertility Clinic consultation — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-17)
- Freedom of information — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority · link (read 2026-09-17)
- 2022 Final Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Summary — US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · link (read 2026-09-16)
Where it came from: Cited a source named here · Harvested pulled from an open dataset · Trade practice how the trade works, hedged · Inference this project's own reasoning · Field somebody stood there. This record as JSON.